This has to go into the, "Gee, somebody goofed" list:
A pair of Midland FRS-type consumer-grade walkie-talkie radios that should normally sell for around $60-80 USD is listing on the Amazon site for a gut-busting one million dollars.
That's right, bubba. If you're an uber-rich billionaire with money burning holes in your pockets you can be the ONLY person on the planet to purchase this single pair of million-dollar radios.
Being the good Samaritan-type I decided to alert Amazon to the pricing snafu; their response was that since it's been listed by a third party it's their right to set pricing, and Amazon has no responsibility to pull down what is either a gross error or, an outright scam.
While I seriously doubt anyone who's not been declared legally insane would actually purchase these radios it's still amazing to me that Amazon would simply throw their hands up and play dumb.
An email to the listing seller should clear this up. Right?
Oct 21, 2012
Sep 21, 2012
Focal XS Book: Review
One of the things that reviewers often do - and I'm guilty of this at times as well, is starting off with a bunch of background info on the product before getting into the meat of the review itself. This time around I'll spare you the reader, that agony and just get to it.
Because of my previous experience with Focal's other monitors I'd almost expected the little XS Book pair to sound like a scaled-down version of one of Focal's professional near-field monitors. Well, they do and they don't.
Right off the bat these little dynamos sound "boxy", for lack of a better term. And logically they should; the drivers are in a physically small-ish enclosure with not much airspace internally to push around. Ah, but if you take that as the overall impression you'd be missing out on the real powerhouse the little gems really are.
Yes indeed, they do have a narrow-sounding resonance that's akin to the boom-boxes of the 80's. (Those of you who didn't grow up with either 8-track or cassette tapes as a primary method for listening to music won't know what the hell I'm talking about.) And like any desktop-sized monitors they do have their own sonic fingerprint that you'd have to adjust to especially if you're used to listening to flat, near-field monitors.
But after you break in the drivers the XS Book really opens up, most especially in the ranges handled by the tweeter. And with the front-firing port you don't need these to be mounted near a wall to have PLENTY of bass reinforcement. In fact, even at mid-volume levels your desk will most definitely be vibrating to the point that you'd risk having a laptop hard-drive start skipping if it were on the desk. That's heavy-duty SPL's, my friend.
Overall the sound is definitely well-rounded, musical, with plenty of low-end to fill out the airspace near your ears and, once broken in the tweeters are bright and airy without being shrill. Do these sound like $1500 monitors? Of course not, if they did Focal would have transcended even what Bose can't do, which is make small, sub-5" inch monitors sound like big ones.
The main driver is 4" inch, the tweeter is aluminum (with some Focal-proprietary materials behind the main tweeter face that makes it more organic sounding), the crossover is at 3 Khz and the pair is rated at 55hz-22khz.
A few items of note:
One reviewer said that he found unusually high instances of floor noise, "white noise" or hiss as it was referred to with no input or "idle". I can tell you that ANY self-powered speaker will exhibit some audible floor noise at idle, even those costing thousands of dollars, but you have to be in an extremely quiet environment to hear it. The source of the floor noise is the built-in amplifiers that live inside the speaker housing and, because of their uber-close proximity to the drivers themselves it's nearly impossible to shield out ALL the RF energy caused by the amps doing their job.
Floor noise in the XS Book was not noticeable at all to me in my home office when it was totally quiet around me. However if I put my ear close to the tweeter - is in about an inch away, I could hear the customary "hiss". More than totally acceptable, the floor noise in the XS Book is actually less than some high-end active monitors I've tested. (look at my review of ANY M-audio monitor).
Also, the grilles that come with this pair have a very thick plastic wire-frame on the inside which unfortunately blocks quite a bit of the audio output from the tweeters; you need to REMOVE the grilles if you want to hear all the goodness the tweeters are capable of. Not sure why Focal felt it necessary to make the interior grille framework so thick and wide.
A few niggles I didn't like:
There is no "OFF" switch. Right, once you connect power and turn it on the first time all you can do is put the units to "SLEEP". Which also leaves you with the totally ridiculous white LED in low-power mode to remind you the speakers are sleeping. Totally unnecessary and very, very annoying, to have this semi-bright LED glaring in your eyes. Again, there's no logic to this lack of a true power switch and it's something very "Apple-like", where they leave a light on to tell you the unit is "off". ugh.
Also, the instructions that come with the unit...well, there are no instructions per-se. There's a diagram that shows you what parts come in the box - in various languages - and arrows to show you where to connect the various cables, the volume dial and the not-so-real "power" switch. That's it. Nothing about proper setup, break-in period... nada.
That's really disappointing because Focal is known worldwide as a top-notch provider of high-end professional audio equipment, so for this unit to be left out in the cold with no owners manual to speak of is very odd, to say the least.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED
The Focal XS Book is extremely well built with solid enclosures, superb craftsmanship, comes with high-quality cabling (every type you'd need) and most important, they're one of the best non-2.1 desktop monitors I've ever heard. In fact, this is probably the BEST stereo pair desktop-sized monitors I've heard, period!
Because of my previous experience with Focal's other monitors I'd almost expected the little XS Book pair to sound like a scaled-down version of one of Focal's professional near-field monitors. Well, they do and they don't.
Right off the bat these little dynamos sound "boxy", for lack of a better term. And logically they should; the drivers are in a physically small-ish enclosure with not much airspace internally to push around. Ah, but if you take that as the overall impression you'd be missing out on the real powerhouse the little gems really are.
Yes indeed, they do have a narrow-sounding resonance that's akin to the boom-boxes of the 80's. (Those of you who didn't grow up with either 8-track or cassette tapes as a primary method for listening to music won't know what the hell I'm talking about.) And like any desktop-sized monitors they do have their own sonic fingerprint that you'd have to adjust to especially if you're used to listening to flat, near-field monitors.
But after you break in the drivers the XS Book really opens up, most especially in the ranges handled by the tweeter. And with the front-firing port you don't need these to be mounted near a wall to have PLENTY of bass reinforcement. In fact, even at mid-volume levels your desk will most definitely be vibrating to the point that you'd risk having a laptop hard-drive start skipping if it were on the desk. That's heavy-duty SPL's, my friend.
Overall the sound is definitely well-rounded, musical, with plenty of low-end to fill out the airspace near your ears and, once broken in the tweeters are bright and airy without being shrill. Do these sound like $1500 monitors? Of course not, if they did Focal would have transcended even what Bose can't do, which is make small, sub-5" inch monitors sound like big ones.
The main driver is 4" inch, the tweeter is aluminum (with some Focal-proprietary materials behind the main tweeter face that makes it more organic sounding), the crossover is at 3 Khz and the pair is rated at 55hz-22khz.
A few items of note:
One reviewer said that he found unusually high instances of floor noise, "white noise" or hiss as it was referred to with no input or "idle". I can tell you that ANY self-powered speaker will exhibit some audible floor noise at idle, even those costing thousands of dollars, but you have to be in an extremely quiet environment to hear it. The source of the floor noise is the built-in amplifiers that live inside the speaker housing and, because of their uber-close proximity to the drivers themselves it's nearly impossible to shield out ALL the RF energy caused by the amps doing their job.
Floor noise in the XS Book was not noticeable at all to me in my home office when it was totally quiet around me. However if I put my ear close to the tweeter - is in about an inch away, I could hear the customary "hiss". More than totally acceptable, the floor noise in the XS Book is actually less than some high-end active monitors I've tested. (look at my review of ANY M-audio monitor).
Also, the grilles that come with this pair have a very thick plastic wire-frame on the inside which unfortunately blocks quite a bit of the audio output from the tweeters; you need to REMOVE the grilles if you want to hear all the goodness the tweeters are capable of. Not sure why Focal felt it necessary to make the interior grille framework so thick and wide.
A few niggles I didn't like:
There is no "OFF" switch. Right, once you connect power and turn it on the first time all you can do is put the units to "SLEEP". Which also leaves you with the totally ridiculous white LED in low-power mode to remind you the speakers are sleeping. Totally unnecessary and very, very annoying, to have this semi-bright LED glaring in your eyes. Again, there's no logic to this lack of a true power switch and it's something very "Apple-like", where they leave a light on to tell you the unit is "off". ugh.
Also, the instructions that come with the unit...well, there are no instructions per-se. There's a diagram that shows you what parts come in the box - in various languages - and arrows to show you where to connect the various cables, the volume dial and the not-so-real "power" switch. That's it. Nothing about proper setup, break-in period... nada.
That's really disappointing because Focal is known worldwide as a top-notch provider of high-end professional audio equipment, so for this unit to be left out in the cold with no owners manual to speak of is very odd, to say the least.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED
The Focal XS Book is extremely well built with solid enclosures, superb craftsmanship, comes with high-quality cabling (every type you'd need) and most important, they're one of the best non-2.1 desktop monitors I've ever heard. In fact, this is probably the BEST stereo pair desktop-sized monitors I've heard, period!
Sep 2, 2012
F-86 in FSX
While not a fully-adopted-for FSX, here's a model designed for FS9 that's been ported over to FSX: The venerable F-86 Sabre from SectionF8.com.
The Sabre has always been one of my favorite fighters and even today it still has gorgeous lines.
It's interesting that while the F-16 is known as having the worlds best near-360-degree view, the F-86 had a gorgeous bubble canopy, not unlike it's prop-driven predecessor the P-51 Mustang.
Not sure when SectionF8 will release a fully compatible FSX version, but this one flies just great as is - and damned if it doesn't look nearly real in the air.
Here's a few screenshots from a recent "flight". Enjoy.
The Sabre has always been one of my favorite fighters and even today it still has gorgeous lines.
It's interesting that while the F-16 is known as having the worlds best near-360-degree view, the F-86 had a gorgeous bubble canopy, not unlike it's prop-driven predecessor the P-51 Mustang.
Not sure when SectionF8 will release a fully compatible FSX version, but this one flies just great as is - and damned if it doesn't look nearly real in the air.
Here's a few screenshots from a recent "flight". Enjoy.
Labels:
F-86 Sabre,
FSX,
sabre fighter,
sectionf8 f-86
Aug 9, 2012
Science Fiction becomes reality. Sort of.
Today I saw a video of a NASA moon-lander prototype being tested (and subsequently failed) for it's autonomous takeoff-landing capabilities:
http://youtu.be/yZPnTK3Bhgw
I couldn't help but notice how very similar it looks to another moon-transport vehicle, the "Eagle", which came from a little-known Gerry Anderson sci-fi series from the 70's called, "Space 1999".
Take a look at this clip and tell me you don't see an erie similarity, with the external truss-like landing gear and bulbous apparatus hanging off the side:
http://yt.cl.nr/YAt60HrSkzI
Unfortunately I can't find any clip on the web from the original series of an Eagle lifting off from the pad, but the same dust-blowing-out from beneath the craft looks exactly like this NASA prototype's footage.
Cool stuff.
http://youtu.be/yZPnTK3Bhgw
I couldn't help but notice how very similar it looks to another moon-transport vehicle, the "Eagle", which came from a little-known Gerry Anderson sci-fi series from the 70's called, "Space 1999".
Take a look at this clip and tell me you don't see an erie similarity, with the external truss-like landing gear and bulbous apparatus hanging off the side:
http://yt.cl.nr/YAt60HrSkzI
Unfortunately I can't find any clip on the web from the original series of an Eagle lifting off from the pad, but the same dust-blowing-out from beneath the craft looks exactly like this NASA prototype's footage.
Cool stuff.
Aug 5, 2012
OpenDNS: Don't buy into the hype.
Recently I was listening to a talk-radio show dedicated to solving common computer issues, and of course the focus is nearly 100% about PC-based systems since they're the ones normally flush with viruses, spyware and registry issues. (not that Mac's are trouble-free but certainly OS X users don't suffer the same daily headaches PC users do, not by a long-shot - and I use BOTH platforms daily and can speak from decades of experience.)
In this "talk-show for PC geeks" it was suggested that everyone on the planet, both home and business users alike, should be using "OpenDNS" to control the DNS IP addresses that your browser uses to surf the 'net. The claims were that using OpenDNS servers would both speed up the browser and, create extra security.
On the surface it sounded like a good idea and there is *some* logic to the arguement that having control over DNS server names/IP's would in theory create a more secure browsing environment.
OpenDNS has several levels of service offerings, ranging from free to expensive monthly fees specific to large business server platforms. I tested the home/free version both on the Mac and PC side.
OpenDNS is a collaboration of two things: Manually inserting the OpenDNS server addresses in your router or directly in your browser if you don't use a router of any sort and, their "updater" software which runs in the background and supposedly makes changes to DNS settings shoud the OpenDNS people decide that for security reasons they need to change something.
Without getting too technical about exactly how OpenDNS works let me explain it in laymens english and use a simply analogy:
The internet is very similar to the highways and roadways across the country. If you want to get from point A (your computer) to another website anywhere in the world (point B) you (your data connection) has to use these roadways to travel to where that website lives so it can share that information with you.
But getting TO that website isn't as straight-forward as you might think and here's an example:
Let's say you live in LA and want to drive to say, Denver CO. How you get there is totally up to you. If you're in a hurry you'd take the straightest, most direct route and use the highway system and it might take you 2 or 3 days to get there. Or, if you're in a sightseeing mood you could take the backroads and literally take weeks instead.
When you type in any web addresss or click on any link on a website your browser sends out a signal (a data packet in techno-speak) through your computer's internet connection which starts "driving" through the internet on it's way to the destination website. As your packet is traveling along it reads various roadmaps that tell it how to get it's intended destination - and here's where the trouble can happen: There's more than one roadmap, in fact there are millions, and it the information is incorrect or worse, if it's *intentionally* wrong, as in a hacker trying to re-direct you to another website, then your packet gets re-routed to the wrong place or worse, it gets fed information to report back to anonymous hackers YOUR computers information.
It's all incredibly complicated and convoluted, but the premise behind OpenDNS is that THEY are supplying a huge databank of "clean" internet servers that don't intentionally re-direct your packet to the wrong place and, are supposedly sweeping for the work of hackers who are trying to find ways into your computer.
That's all well and good, but what's really going on behind the scenes at OpenDNS is that by purposely installing their background software AND, by purposely using their DNS server database guess what... they now have TOTAL control over where your data packets go and furthermore, have a complete list of every browsing session you create, what servers your packet goes to, how long and even how much data you extract back and forth.
Not too long ago companies like Google and Apple were fined by the Feds for purposely putting tracing software in cell phones to track your usage, your location and other information and then using it for their own purposes - mostly to feed you advertisements along tracking your location. And they did this all on the sly, using software very cleverly hiden deep inside the operating system code of the cell phone itself, not external software.
With OpenDNS the same thing is going on; you're totally opening up your system to a big corporation and hoping and trusting that they're NOT going to use all this information that you're freely sharing with them for purposes other than "keeping your computer safe.".
In practical use I did indeed find that while using OpenDNS my web-page browsing was being purposely re-directed to other servers (you can see this activity in the address bar of your browser when you clink a link or hit "enter" on a manually entered web address). But instead of speeding up the browser it actually slowed things down - and by quite a bit - while all these "safe" re-directs were going on.
These obvious re-directs made me quite suspicious especially since one of their big selling points is that they're supposedly going to make browsing the 'net faster.
Then my next big red flag was when I decided it was time to get off the OpenDNS service, there was NO LINK to cancel or deactivate my OpenDNS account. Huh? They make it easy to sign up and share my information, but when I decide I DON'T want to be part of their world there's no method for saying "no thank you, cancel me." ?
The only way you can cancel your OpenDNS account is to send in a request to their tech support and request it. There's no explanation as to why this is the method however it's been my experience that internet-based companies who are doing something on the down-low don't make it easy to get off of their service.
In fact, that's how spyware works on PC's: you install some program that promises to "help" your computer, and then when you figure out it's not and try to uninstall it... it won't LET you uninstall!
OpenDNS has a plethora of positive testimonials supposedly ranging from home users all the way to Fortune 100 companies who swear the service is the best thing since sliced bread. And while I have no proof that OpenDNS is doing anything outright malicious, I was able to quickly debunk their claims of higher security and faster browsing.
As far as I can tell, OpenDNS is nothing but a very high-gloss method for allowing a big company to oversee your browsing activity and keep records on what you're doing. For what ultimate purpose I can't say, but when I consider the false claims of speed and security coupled with a not-so-direct method for cancelling an account I have absolutely no reason to trust them.
And neither should you.
In this "talk-show for PC geeks" it was suggested that everyone on the planet, both home and business users alike, should be using "OpenDNS" to control the DNS IP addresses that your browser uses to surf the 'net. The claims were that using OpenDNS servers would both speed up the browser and, create extra security.
On the surface it sounded like a good idea and there is *some* logic to the arguement that having control over DNS server names/IP's would in theory create a more secure browsing environment.
OpenDNS has several levels of service offerings, ranging from free to expensive monthly fees specific to large business server platforms. I tested the home/free version both on the Mac and PC side.
OpenDNS is a collaboration of two things: Manually inserting the OpenDNS server addresses in your router or directly in your browser if you don't use a router of any sort and, their "updater" software which runs in the background and supposedly makes changes to DNS settings shoud the OpenDNS people decide that for security reasons they need to change something.
Without getting too technical about exactly how OpenDNS works let me explain it in laymens english and use a simply analogy:
The internet is very similar to the highways and roadways across the country. If you want to get from point A (your computer) to another website anywhere in the world (point B) you (your data connection) has to use these roadways to travel to where that website lives so it can share that information with you.
But getting TO that website isn't as straight-forward as you might think and here's an example:
Let's say you live in LA and want to drive to say, Denver CO. How you get there is totally up to you. If you're in a hurry you'd take the straightest, most direct route and use the highway system and it might take you 2 or 3 days to get there. Or, if you're in a sightseeing mood you could take the backroads and literally take weeks instead.
When you type in any web addresss or click on any link on a website your browser sends out a signal (a data packet in techno-speak) through your computer's internet connection which starts "driving" through the internet on it's way to the destination website. As your packet is traveling along it reads various roadmaps that tell it how to get it's intended destination - and here's where the trouble can happen: There's more than one roadmap, in fact there are millions, and it the information is incorrect or worse, if it's *intentionally* wrong, as in a hacker trying to re-direct you to another website, then your packet gets re-routed to the wrong place or worse, it gets fed information to report back to anonymous hackers YOUR computers information.
It's all incredibly complicated and convoluted, but the premise behind OpenDNS is that THEY are supplying a huge databank of "clean" internet servers that don't intentionally re-direct your packet to the wrong place and, are supposedly sweeping for the work of hackers who are trying to find ways into your computer.
That's all well and good, but what's really going on behind the scenes at OpenDNS is that by purposely installing their background software AND, by purposely using their DNS server database guess what... they now have TOTAL control over where your data packets go and furthermore, have a complete list of every browsing session you create, what servers your packet goes to, how long and even how much data you extract back and forth.
Not too long ago companies like Google and Apple were fined by the Feds for purposely putting tracing software in cell phones to track your usage, your location and other information and then using it for their own purposes - mostly to feed you advertisements along tracking your location. And they did this all on the sly, using software very cleverly hiden deep inside the operating system code of the cell phone itself, not external software.
With OpenDNS the same thing is going on; you're totally opening up your system to a big corporation and hoping and trusting that they're NOT going to use all this information that you're freely sharing with them for purposes other than "keeping your computer safe.".
In practical use I did indeed find that while using OpenDNS my web-page browsing was being purposely re-directed to other servers (you can see this activity in the address bar of your browser when you clink a link or hit "enter" on a manually entered web address). But instead of speeding up the browser it actually slowed things down - and by quite a bit - while all these "safe" re-directs were going on.
These obvious re-directs made me quite suspicious especially since one of their big selling points is that they're supposedly going to make browsing the 'net faster.
Then my next big red flag was when I decided it was time to get off the OpenDNS service, there was NO LINK to cancel or deactivate my OpenDNS account. Huh? They make it easy to sign up and share my information, but when I decide I DON'T want to be part of their world there's no method for saying "no thank you, cancel me." ?
The only way you can cancel your OpenDNS account is to send in a request to their tech support and request it. There's no explanation as to why this is the method however it's been my experience that internet-based companies who are doing something on the down-low don't make it easy to get off of their service.
In fact, that's how spyware works on PC's: you install some program that promises to "help" your computer, and then when you figure out it's not and try to uninstall it... it won't LET you uninstall!
OpenDNS has a plethora of positive testimonials supposedly ranging from home users all the way to Fortune 100 companies who swear the service is the best thing since sliced bread. And while I have no proof that OpenDNS is doing anything outright malicious, I was able to quickly debunk their claims of higher security and faster browsing.
As far as I can tell, OpenDNS is nothing but a very high-gloss method for allowing a big company to oversee your browsing activity and keep records on what you're doing. For what ultimate purpose I can't say, but when I consider the false claims of speed and security coupled with a not-so-direct method for cancelling an account I have absolutely no reason to trust them.
And neither should you.
Jul 30, 2012
Got the Compressor blues? Use Adobe Media Encoder!
I'm fortunate to have both FCP 7 and Production Premium CS6 on my system.
Just yesterday I was going to use Compressor to encode a very short Blu-Ray to then be authored in Encore. (There has been a workflow for this ever since CS4)
As fate would have it, Compressor started giving me the infamous, "I can't do any kind of work because I've lost my mind..." error message. Actually the error message was, "Qmaster file agent not found." First time I've seen that excuse not to work.
After spending 20 minutes trying to suss out the issue and running through the usual methods for troubleshooting - including using Digital Rebellions' Compressor Repair - I finally gave up and fired up Adobe Media Encoder and "got 'r done". What a relief. Remember those old Apple ads for Macintosh, "It just works." ? That's what can be said for AME.
In another post I did a comparison between Adobe Media Encoder and Compressor and the results were fanatasic, both in speed benefits and quality.
So why even bother with Compressor at this point? Eh, force of habit and I simply wanted to compare H.264 encodes for BR and see what the differences were. But since Compressor decided to take a nap, that just wasn't possible!
Adobe offers AME as a download on it's website however, it's not clear if you can use it *without* Premiere Pro also being installed or not. It's worth trying if you can't get Compressor to play nice.
Just yesterday I was going to use Compressor to encode a very short Blu-Ray to then be authored in Encore. (There has been a workflow for this ever since CS4)
As fate would have it, Compressor started giving me the infamous, "I can't do any kind of work because I've lost my mind..." error message. Actually the error message was, "Qmaster file agent not found." First time I've seen that excuse not to work.
After spending 20 minutes trying to suss out the issue and running through the usual methods for troubleshooting - including using Digital Rebellions' Compressor Repair - I finally gave up and fired up Adobe Media Encoder and "got 'r done". What a relief. Remember those old Apple ads for Macintosh, "It just works." ? That's what can be said for AME.
In another post I did a comparison between Adobe Media Encoder and Compressor and the results were fanatasic, both in speed benefits and quality.
So why even bother with Compressor at this point? Eh, force of habit and I simply wanted to compare H.264 encodes for BR and see what the differences were. But since Compressor decided to take a nap, that just wasn't possible!
Adobe offers AME as a download on it's website however, it's not clear if you can use it *without* Premiere Pro also being installed or not. It's worth trying if you can't get Compressor to play nice.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






